MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2367634995

Molecular Cloning and Nucleotide Sequence Analysis of the Labrador Retriever CfOLF4 Gene

2007· article· en· W2367634995 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hui Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueDongwuxue zazhi · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related gene regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLabrador RetrieverCloning (programming)GeneMolecular cloningCanisGeneticsBiologyNucleic acid sequenceSequence analysisSequence (biology)Gene sequencePlasmidRecombinant DNAMolecular biologyPeptide sequenceMedicineEcologyPhylogenetic tree
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study,pMD 18-T cloning vector was used and the 879 bp OR gene of Labrador Retriever(Canis familiaris) policedog was successfullycloned.Following T-A cloning,the recombinant plasmid pMD-CfOLF4 was sequenced and compared with the published sequence of dogs from GeneBank to analyze the variability of the Labrador Retriever OR gene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDongwuxue zazhiSame topicCancer-related gene regulationFrench-language works237,207