Health-related quality of life in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the health-related quality of life in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome and the influencing factors.Methods: The Calgary questionnaire for health-related quality of life of patients with sleep apnea and the Epworth sleepiness scale(ESS) were used to evaluate the quality of life and excessive daytime sleepiness(EDS) in OSAHS patients and simple snoring patients.The Pearson correlation and stepwise multiple regression analysis were used to analyze the correlation between the SAQLI and body mass index(BMI),neck collar,abdomen circumference,sleep architecture,respiratory disturbances and EDS.Results: There was a difference in each aspect between OSAHS patients and simple snoring patients.The SAQLI was significantly correlated with EDS.Conclusions: The health-related quality of life in patients with OSAHS is reduced.EDS is an important influencing factor for the health-related quality of life in patients with OSAHS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".