Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONTEMPORARY COSTUME FILM Jullanne Pidduck London: British Film Institute, 2004, 224 pp. Reviewed by Dimitris Eleftheriotis Contemporary Costume Film is an absorbing, often exquisite book that rewards the reader with a plethora of detailed and nuanced observations. By the same token it is a particularly challenging book to review because the real success and value of Contemporary Costume Film lies less in an overarching argument or arguments (although several do exist) than in the complex and sophisticated investigation of textual, intertextual, cultural, socio-political, spatial, and temporal relationships that are pursued through close, meticulous and insightful readings of dozens of key films. A reviewer attempting to summarise Pidduck's work will almost certainly miss the point. The trees are far more important than the woods in this book, and attention to detail elegantly presented is what makes Contemporary Costume Film such an exemplary film studies text. Contemporary Costume Film indulges the reader with generous doses of exemplary textual analysis offering highly original and insightful perspectives on films that have attracted considerable scholarship in the past (The Piano, The Age of Innocence), and on less popular texts (Elizabeth, Gosford Park]. Equally successful is the identification of contemporaneous discourses and political contexts that infuse the films' aesthetics. For example, an invented sub-plot concerning the prosecution of Risley in Maurice is linked to political struggles against Thatcher's Clause 28 legislation, while Derek Jarman's Caravaggio and Edward II are read against concerns around AIDS (on autobiographical as well as political levels). Motivated by the desire to move the critical debate on costume drama beyond notions of nostalgia, Pidduck opens up a number of temporal tensions informing the critical function of contemporary costume dramas. These tensions are located in the texts themselves, in the setting of so many stories in a transitional era (the microcosms of the nineteenth and the early twentieth centuries when processes of modernisation challenge previous socio-cultural formations), and beyond the texts, in the encounters between the then of the fictions and the now of their moment of production. Such a move renders doubly problematic the critical emphasis on a nostalgic return to the past as the sole function of costume drama. The revisited settings are not sanitised islands referencing untroubled moments of the past, but dynamic fields riddled with conflict, repression and desire. Furthermore, the cinematic act of revisiting adds layers of contemporary discursive and aesthetic concerns and practices to the representations of the past. Contemporary Costume Film's line of enquiry involves, on the one hand, the examination of specific configurations of space-time informed by Mikhail Bakhtin's concept of the chronotope, and on the other hand, a dynamic understanding of some of the most pervasive visual themes of the films that is informed by Deleuze's theorisation of the movement-image. As with almost everything in this book, the use of theory is exemplary. It is introduced as needed, and it is there to enable critical analysis but not to dictate it. Pidduck has a great sense not only of the substance of an argument but also of its form and style, an ability subtly demonstrated in her identification of a possible stylistic tension in the use of the two grand theories informing her work: Bakhtin's emphasis on the heaviness of determination and slowness of history is contrasted with Deleuze's preoccupation with movement and change. Importantly, this is fully embraced in terms of its resonance with the textuality of the films analysed: This tension echoes recursively between costume drama's own intransigent stasis (and imputed conservatism), and its tremendous quiet energy. Embracing complexity and contradiction is a main feature of Contemporary Costume Film, as analysis of film after film opens up and explores multiple possible readings, making continuous connections with other films and critical discourses, and pointing to gaps and omissions. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it