The Three European-American Countries' Success: How Could Vasectomy Become the Popular Voluntary Choice
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It went through two phases for vasectomy to be widely accepted among men in Canada, United Kingdom and the United States over the past two hundred years in which there were two transitions in the use of contraceptives and two waves of gender equality movements. During the first phase in which the interaction between the first contraceptive transition and the first gender equality movement took place from the end of 18 th to the beginning of 20 th century, men's use of contraception and masculinities went from being in a contradictory relationship to that of integration. Men took contraceptive responsibility by way of traditional means including sexual abstinence and continence. The second phase began in the 1960 s and continues to date. During this period, the second contraceptive transition integrates with the second gender equality movement. Though the governments have not specifically intervened, the availability of high quality medical services enables men to voluntarily take contraceptive responsibilities by choosing vasectomy, and this has become a new characteristic of masculinities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it