MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2368133312

Application of Wind Energy Simulation Toolkit(WEST) to Wind Energy Numerical Simulation of China

2008· article· en· W2368133312 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhang De, Rong Zhu, Yong Luo, Wei Yu, Wang Cheng-hai

Bibliographic record

VenueGaoyuan qixiang · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Energy Research and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaMeteorologyPlateau (mathematics)Wind powerComputer simulationWind speedEnvironmental scienceClimatologyGeographyGeologySimulationComputer scienceEngineeringMathematicsArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian wind energy simulation toolkit(WEST) is applied to making wind atlas of China.Comparing with the observation data,the stations which simulation relative error less than 20% are mostly located in the eastern and the costal area of China,but the stations which relative error lager than 60% are mostly located in the high-lying western China.It is found that the WEST has more accurate distribution of wind energy resources in mid-east China with low-lying than in the western plateau of China.It shows that the climatic background classification and the atmospheric boundary layer parameterization schemes of WEST are needed to be modified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.518
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGaoyuan qixiangSame topicWind Energy Research and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207