MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2368142674

Discussion on Standardization of Mining Enterprises Social Responsibility by Using e3 Plus Framework for Reference

2010· article· en· W2368142674 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cao Xian-zhen

Bibliographic record

VenueConservation and Utilization of Mineral Resources · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSafety and Risk Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStandardizationCorporate social responsibilitySocial responsibilityBusinessMining industryAccountingPublic relationsKnowledge managementPolitical scienceEngineeringComputer scienceLawMining engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based upon e3 Plus framework which was created by the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada,the contents of mining enterprises social responsibility were introduced.The functions and difficult points of implementing mining enterprises social responsibility were also discussed.And the author offered some proposals for standardizing enterprises corporate social responsibility,including fostering awareness of and promoting mining corporate social responsibility on a legal basis,establishing evaluation system,advocating the enterprises to issue the social responsibility report,reforming the existing cost accounting system,developing green mining and strengthening the communication and exchange between enterprises and community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.035
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.183

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0350.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0070.012
Scholarly communication0.0100.013
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0110.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConservation and Utilization of Mineral ResourcesSame topicSafety and Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207