Relation of Autoimmune Cytopenia to Glandular and Systemic Manifestations in Primary Sjögren Syndrome: Analysis of 113 Korean Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the characteristics of patients with primary Sjögren syndrome (pSS) who have autoimmune cytopenia. METHODS: We analyzed 113 participants from the Korean Initiative of Primary Sjögren Syndrome, a prospective pSS cohort. Autoimmune cytopenia was defined as autoimmune origin neutropenia, anemia, and/or thrombocytopenia without vitamin or iron deficiency, or drug-induced cytopenia. To identify the association between autoimmune cytopenia and the clinical characteristics of pSS, extraglandular manifestations were analyzed according to the European League Against Rheumatism Sjögren's syndrome disease activity index (ESSDAI) definition. Xerophthalmia was assessed with the Ocular Surface Disease Index, Schirmer I test, ocular stain score (OSS), and tear film breakup time. RESULTS: The median total ESSDAI score was 2 (interquartile range 1-6). About a quarter of patients had no systemic activity. Autoimmune cytopenia was observed in 23.9% of patients (n = 27). Moderate biological features were more frequently observed in patients with autoimmune cytopenia than in patients without [10 (37%) and 11 (12.8%), respectively, p = 0.016]. Articular involvement was exhibited in 1 patient with autoimmune cytopenia, but in 23 patients (27.4%) without autoimmune cytopenia (p = 0.013). Higher OSS (p = 0.002) and lower mean Schirmer I test (p = 0.029) were observed in patients with autoimmune cytopenia than in those without. Neutrophils and lymphocytes negatively correlated with OSS (ρ = -0.204, p = 0.041 and ρ = -0.230, p = 0.020, respectively). CONCLUSION: Autoimmune cytopenia is closely associated with severe ocular surface damage in pSS. Therefore, assessment of xerophthalmia by ophthalmologists may be mandatory, particularly in patients with pSS with cytopenia, even if patients do not complain of eye dryness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".