Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present paper deals with two sections of Huang’ai,Shengping and Tianlingkou Formations in Gongcheng,Guangxi Autonomous Region used to be regarded as of Cambrian age due to the lacking of fossils.In 1997 Ordovician graptolites indicating mainly Middle Ordovician were first discovered from the rocks,and briefly reported in 1999.The details of these two sections are presented herein,and biostrati- graphy discussed.The sections,located in the northeast of Gongcheng,Guangxi with considerably abun- dant Ordovician graptolites,include the following 8 graptolite zones(in descending order):8.Nemagrap- tus gracilis,7.Pterograptus elegans,6.Nicholosonograptus fasciculatus,5.Acrograptus ellesae,4.Undu- lograptus austrodentatus,3.Exigraptus clavus,2.Isograptus caduceus of.imitatus,1.Didymograptus (E.)abnomis.The graptolite biozones are comparable with those in SE China,Australia,Canada,North America and Great Britain.The succession is believed to be representative of deep-water‘Isograptus’fa- cies in the Zhujiang Region of South China.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".