Study on the International Cooperation of Traditional Chinese Medicine between the Pearl Reviver Delta and Canada's Ontario Province
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In December 2006,Canada's Ontario province passed the Traditional Chinese Medicine Act.The dramatic legal environment change has led to new challenges and opportunities for the development of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Canada.This paper conducts a research on the international cooperation between traditional Chinese medicine organizations of the Pearl River Delta area and those of Ontario province by applying LE PEST C model,SWOT model,Five Forces model,Paradigm model and 4Ps marketing theories.It applies a multi-perspective study of the opportunities,current situations,foundation,barriers and feasibility of cooperation between the two parties.Some strategic proposals are finally proposed,such as,cooperating between higher education organizations to cultivate Chinese doctors,cooperating between marketing and sales companies to promote Chinese medicine,and cooperating between hospitals and medical organizations to pave the way of entering into Ontario health insurance systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it