Bibliographic record
Abstract
Daily dietary consumption is closely linked to water resources protection. According to the dietary consumption per urban and rural resident in Jilin province in 1999- 2011,the dietary w ater footprints are calculated,and its characteristics are analyzed. The result show s the fluctuation of the dietary w ater footprint per urban and rural resident in Jilin province in 1999- 2011 is not significant,but there are differences betw een the dietary w ater footprint of urban and rural resident. The w ater footprint ratio of meat is the highest for urban resident,w hile the w ater footprint ratio of grain is the highest for rural resident. Diversity index of dietary w ater footprint for urban resident is higher than rural resident,and both are increasing,especially rural resident's increases fast,w hich show s the w ater footprint of dietary types tend to be more and more balanced,w hereby the types of dietary consumption are constantly rich. The inequality index of dietary w ater footprint per urban and rural resident show s that there exists difference betw een the dietary w ater footprint of urban and rural resident,w hile the difference is not big,that is to say,the unfair is not obvious.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".