Clinicopathological Analysis of Autopsy of 36 Cases with Sudden Cardiac Death
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the clinicopathological characteristics of autopsy of thirty-six cases with sudden cardiac death and provide a theoretical basis for the diagnosis and prevention of sudden cardiac death.Methods: Thirty-six patients with sudden cardiac death were autopsied and the histopathological examinations were performed by being routinely embedded in paraffin,complete serial sections and stained with HE and then observed light microscope and the information of thirty-six autopsy cases were collected with sudden cardiac death.Results:Among thirty-six died of sudden cardiac death,the cases with coronary heart disease was the most abundant accounting for 21 cases and for 58.33% of the total cases,and the cases with arrhiythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy accounted for 3 cases and for 8.33% of the total cases.Conclusion: Correct and systematic autopsy could determine the causes of sudden death and offer scientific evidence for medical identification,otherwise,it was important to improve medical quality,early diagnosing,treatment of cardiovascular diseases and decrease the sudden cardiac death rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".