MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2368876981

[The changes of electrocardiogram and impact of early invasive strategy in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation].

2005· article· en· W2368876981 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dayi Hu, Fuchun Zhang, Yang Wu, Muyang Yan, Shiwen Wang, Jieming Mao, Ming Yang, Liqing Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineST segmentInternal medicineCardiologyMyocardial infarctionDepression (economics)Acute coronary syndromeAnginaST elevationIncidence (geometry)Canadian Cardiovascular SocietyST depressionUnstable anginaElectrocardiography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the changes of electrocardiogram (ECG) and impact of early invasive strategy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) without ST-segment elevation. METHODS: Five hundred and forty-five consecutive ACS patients without ST-segment elevation were randomly assigned to early conservative treatment group and early invasive treatment group. The combined cardiovascular events, including cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal heart failure, and re-hospitalization due to recurrent ischemia angina, within 30 days and 6 months were analyzed and the effects of varied ECG changes and different intervention strategies on outcomes of patients were evaluated. RESULTS: The incidences of each and combined cardiovascular events were higher in the patients with ST-segment depression than in those without ST-segment depression. ST-segment depression was one of independent predictive factors for an increase in cardiovascular events within 6 months (OR 3.864, 95% CI: 1.668 approximately 9.451, P < 0.001). Early invasive strategy was associated with a lower rate of re-hospitalization due to recurrent ischemia angina within 30 days and a decreased incidence of combined cardiovascular events within 30 days and 6 months in comparison with the early conservative treatment group (all P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis implied that incidences of combined cardiovascular events within 30 days and 6 months decreased significantly only in patients with ST-segment depression treated with early invasive strategy, and no such benefit was seen in the patients without ST-segment depression. CONCLUSION: ST-segment depression is an effective indicator for identifying those patients with non-ST segment elevation ACS most likely to benefit from early invasive strategy. Early invasive strategy markedly decreases the cardiovascular events in ACS patients with ST-segment depression than early conservative strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→French-language works237,207→