MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2368953003

Fading-away of An Edge in 20 Years

2003· article· en· W2368953003 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Li L

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chinese Landscape Architecture · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicArchitecture, Modernity, and Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThree gorgesEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionFadingProcess (computing)Sustainable developmentFront (military)GeographyCivil engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringMeteorologyComputer scienceChannel (broadcasting)Political scienceLawGeotechnical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article introduces the design process and i deas of the1st Prize Winner's Works in the International Student Design Competit ion of the40th Annual IFLA World Congress2003in Calgary,Alberta,Canada.This pape r sets the old town Dachang as a typical site in the Three Gorges area.It demons trated in front of us the process of the fading-away landscape of the disappeari ng old town Dachang due to the water-level changes in the Three Gorges Area duri ng20years.A sustainable landscape pattern is served for these old towns beyond t he ways as pulling down and moving away.Thus the paper has turned the keen edge to a growing,continuous and mild developing process.It let the fading-away edge becomes the meristem of a new development.We believe,a new history will be creat ed during the20years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chinese Landscape ArchitectureSame topicArchitecture, Modernity, and DesignFrench-language works237,207