MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2369036959

Study the position in bed for the patients who have used heparin sodium after percutaneous coronary intervention therapy

2006· article· en· W2369036959 on OpenAlex
Wei We

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œJournal of practical nursing · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Management and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConventional PCIPercutaneous coronary interventionMedicineSignificant differenceHeparin sodiumAnxietyHeparinHematomaBed restAnesthesiaSurgeryPhysical therapyInternal medicineMyocardial infarction
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To explore the best position in bed for the patients who have under the operation of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and then used heparin sodium within 24 hours. Methods The 159 patients were divided into two groups randomly:the experimental group and the control group. After the PCI, the subjects in these two groups will rest in bed by two ways. Using McGill′s present Pain Index to evaluate hematoma, using the PPI to evaluate the pain of back, using the STAI to evaluate the condition of anxiety, write the number of patient who have anuresises. Results There are no significant difference between two groups in wound blooding, while the difference of back pain, anxiety and the anuresises are significant between two groups. Conclusion The position of half-lie is safe and comfortable for the patients who have under the operation of PCI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it