Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:To analyze the hospital emergency department in our hospital the clinical features of sudden death,the occurrence of the characteristics and laws.Methods:205 cases of sudden death were choiced in June 1999-December 2008 in our hospital's emergency rescue,by age,gender,time distribution,clinical characteristics and prognosis were retrospectively clinical analysis.Results:(1) 205 cases of sudden death in patients with age distribution,age 18 years of 21 cases,accounting for 10.24%;18 ～ 39-year-old 34 cases,accounting for 16.58%;40 ～ 59-year-old 68 cases,accounting for 33.17%;60 ～ 79-year-old 60 cases,accounting for 29.27%;≥ 80-year-old in 22 cases,accounting for 10.73%.(2) quarterly statistics,58 cases of the first quarter,accounting for 28.29%,41 cases of the second quarter,accounting for 20.00%,45 cases of the third quarter,accounting for 21.95%,61 cases of the fourth quarter,accounting for 29.76%.With a sudden death occurred in the fourth quarter number.(3) the sudden death of patients admitted to the proportion of deaths have increased year-on-year trend.(4) the sudden death of 129 cases of male patients,76 cases of female,male:female=1.70:1.Larger proportion of young adults (18～59 years old 102 cases,accounting for 49.76%).(5) minors more sudden death occurred in the newborn and infant period (15 cases,accounting for 71.43%),particularly in January-year-old the most common.(6) minors based on the existence of sudden death in patients with respiratory diseases for the disease to more than (10 cases,accounting for 47.62%).The existence of adult sudden death in patients with cardiovascular disease in 69 cases (37.50%) rank first,of which 28 cases of coronary heart disease (40.58%) dominated,high blood pressure in 13 cases (18.83%),is an important risk factor,in addition to chronic pulmonary heart disease occurred in eight cases of sudden death cases in this group accounted for a high proportion (11.59%).Conclusions:Our results must be the existence of young and middle-aged men,as well as coronary heart disease,high blood pressure risk factors,such as strengthening the health education group,at the same time attention to the issue of the sudden death of infants and young children.Hospital emergency department personnel to strengthen the construction of a comprehensive rescue and medical personnel training capacity,thereby enhancing the survival rate of sudden death.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".