MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2369288094

Discussion on Qualifications of Property Owners of Residential Quarter

2010· article· en· W2369288094 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
QI En-ping

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Wenzhou University · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal principles and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProperty managementReal estateBusinessProperty (philosophy)Supreme courtEstateProperty lawLegislatureProperty rightsReal propertyQuarter (Canadian coin)LawIntangible propertyLaw and economicsFinancePolitical scienceEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rights and obligations of property users(except property owners)have been regulated in Supreme People's Court's Interpretations on Some Concrete Legal Issues in Trying the Dispute Cases of Determination of Ownerships of Buildings and Supreme People's Court's Interpretations on Some Concrete Legal Issues in Trying the Dispute Cases of Property Management Disputes.The implementation of these two interpretations would help to ameliorate the disorder situations of property management of residential quarters.But the relevant regulations are inadequate.By combining Chinese current real situations with experiences of legislative patterns at home and abroad,rights and obligations of relevant property users(except property owners)should be distinguished.They are as following:Chinese real estate developers do not enjoy qualifications of property owners,renters could conditionally enjoy qualifications of property owners,which is decided by their leasing contracts,and delegates of exclusive right owners could be granted qualifications of property owners.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.856
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Wenzhou UniversitySame topicLegal principles and applicationsFrench-language works237,207