MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2369356183

Study on Structure and Acoustical Properties of TeO_x Thin Films

2010· article· en· W2369356183 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePiezoelectrics and Acoustooptics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOptical and Acousto-Optic Technologies
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyMaterials scienceThin filmSubstrate (aquarium)Fourier transform infrared spectroscopySputter depositionDiffractionDeposition (geology)SputteringOptoelectronicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OpticsChemistryNanotechnologyNuclear magnetic resonance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The tellurium oxide(TeOx) thin film was prepared on different substrate and under different deposition conditions by RF magnetron sputtering technique.The structures and composition of the TeOx films were studied by X-ray diffraction,Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy.The Love-wave devices based on TeOx/36°YX-LiTaO3 structures were fabricated,and the temperature coefficient of delay(TCD) of the devices was investigated.The results showed that TCD of the Love-wave devices was decreased since the TeOx film was deposited.The TCD of the TeOx was a negative value and it was strongly dependent upon the preparation conditions and the thickness of TeOx film.Therefore,the TCD of the Love-wave devices can be optimized by suitably selecting the preparation conditions and the thickness of TeOx films.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score0.744

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it