Observations on the Efficacy of Moxibustion on Du Meridian Points in Treating Mild Cognitive Impairment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To assess the efficacy of moxibustion on Du meridian points in treating mild cognitive impairment using neuropsychological scales.Methods Sixty patients diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment using neuropsychological scales were randomly allocated to treatment and control groups,30 cases each.The treatment group received moxibustion and the control group,medication.Evaluation was made using neuropsychological scales in both groups after treatment.A comparison was made between pretreatment and posttreatment and between the two groups.Results Neuropsychological scales-MMSE and MoCA scores and the ADL score were higher after treatment than before in both groups(P0.05).The MMSE,MoCA and ADL scores improved more in the treatment group than in the control group(P0.05).Conclusion Moxibustion on Du meridian points has a special advantage in improving cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment.It is an effective treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".