NET IMPACT OF PHYSICAL INTERACTION MECHANISMS IN A COUPLED WAVE-TIDE-SURGE MODEL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The focus of this study is a coastal high-resolution (2' X 2') two-way coupled wave-tide-surge interaction model, including three main physical mechanisms. Comparisons and analysis of simulated and measured wave heights and sea level considered two moderate storm cases for the Huang-he Delta coastal area. The effects of different physical mechanisms on wave heights are mainly influenced by wave-current interaction, including radiation stress. Wave-age dependent surface wind stress and radiation stress mechanisms in the coupling wave-tide-surge interaction model show positive impact on sea level, and the wave-current interaction bottom stress mechanism shows negative impact on seal level. The comprehensive effects of the three main physical mechanisms show positive net impact on seal level and increase sea level by around 20cm for the storms considered. Overall, the results we show that the wave heights and sea levels simulated by the coupled wave-tide-surge model agree better with the measured values than uncoupled model results, particularly for peak storm conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".