MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2369732914

Study on Configuration Fabric and Germination Conditions of Flax Seed

2012· article· en· W2369732914 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Junyi Niu

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicVaried Academic Research Topics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerminationAbsorption of waterRadicleAgronomyHorticultureBotanyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to study the water absorption characteristics and germination conditions of flax seed of the Zhang-ya 2,the test is single factor test,morphology,water absorption characteristics,and bud characteristics were studied.The results showed that:The water absorption of the flax seed is consisted of rapid absorption(7 h,absorbent accounted for 93.2% of the maximum water absorption),slow water absorption(7-20 h)and saturation(20 h) three stages.Flax seed germinated at 15-30 ℃,the optimum temperature of gemination was 20 ℃,and light was good for seed germination.20 ℃ and 25 ℃conducive to flax radicle growth,and 35 ℃ conducive to flax seed leaf growth and material accumulation.Seed germination was significantly better than the other test bed.pelleted material of activated carbon and bentonite was conducive to the germination of flax seeds.Pelleting material was good for flax seed germination,especially activated carbon,but unfavorable to the improvement of seed germination index,and pelleted material will help flax seed growth,and leaf color value(SPAD)increase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicVaried Academic Research TopicsFrench-language works237,207