MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2370039653

Dolomite Reservoir Architecture and Pool Characterization of Ordovician Midale Field

2004· article· en· W2370039653 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A Urban

Bibliographic record

VenueChenji xuebao · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyOrdovicianDolomiteCarbonateStratigraphyPetroleum reservoirKarstPaleontologyCarbonate rockBoreholeStructural basinWell loggingUnconformityReservoir modelingGeochemistryPetrologySedimentary rockPetroleum engineeringTectonics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Upper Ordovician Midale Field is located in the northern Williston Basinin southeastern Saskatchewan, Canada.It consists of a serious of low-relief structural traps. The oil source rocks are the same or older stratigraphy in the southern basin center. Thereservoirs are characterized by intercrystalline porosity in the dolomitized matrix with variable amount of vugs and fractures. Based on core examination and density and neutron log analysis, the carbonate reservoirs in the Red River Yeomen Formation can be divided into four zones.Zones1 and 2 are situatedin the upper part of the structural traps and usually bear oil. Although zones3 and 4 are thicker with higher porosity, they usually contain water only because they are located below the spill point of hydrocarbon traps.On a regional scale, however, zone 3 and 4 could be the attractive targets for the future exploration of possible stratigraphictraps where these zones pinch-outlaterally. Thickerzone 1 and 2 are characterized by high-amplitudeandhigh-frequency reflections on seismic profilesbased on examination of log cross-sections, their correspondingwell-linked 3 D seismic profiles,and forward modeling of seismic response. Zone3 and 4, where all four zones are present, can be identified by an additionalpeak beneath the original reservoir reflectionon seismic profiles. The terminationof this additional peak on a seismic profile is, therefore, an indication of pinchout of reservoir zone 3 and 4.This can be used to identify possible stratigraphic traps. The Ordovician oil pools of the Midale area are spatially associated with localized low-relief structuresand presence of the reservoirs zones.The driving mechanism for the Midale pools is interpreted to be a combination ofedge water and bottom waterdrive systems.Based on our analyses of 3D seismic dataand their implication on the stratigraphic and structural evolution in the region, these low relief structures are interpreted as the drape of Red Riverstrata over local Precambrianbasement highs that could have reactivated later. The traps were initiated during the Middle Silurian to the Early Devoniantime and finalized during the Late Cretaceous. Future explorationtargets of stratigraphic trap play are identifiedon thenortheastern wings of the nose structure that is close tohydrocarbon sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChenji xuebaoSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207