Observation of Efficacy on Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy of Syndrome of Liver and Kidney Deficiency Treated by Acupuncture and Moxibustion plus Western Medicine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy of acupuncture plus auricular point plaster therapy in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy of syndrome of liver and kidney deficiency.Methods: Sixty patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy of syndrome of liver and kidney deficiency were randomly divided into two groups.On the basis of the same basic treatment,the treatment group received acupuncture plus auricular point plaster therapy.Treatment lasted 2 weeks.Toronto Clinical Scoring System(TCSS),TCM syndrome integral,glucose metabolism and lipid metabolism in the two groups were investigated.Results: TCSS and TCM syndrome integral improved significantly after treatment in the treatment group(P0.05).Glucose metabolism and lipid metabolism were no differences after treatment between the two groups(P0.05).Conclusion: Acupuncture plus auricular point plaster therapy has a better effect on diabetic peripheral neuropathy of syndrome of liver and kidney deficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".