The Effect of Salinity-Alkalinity Stress on Seed Germination of Main Flax Cultivars in Different Region( Linum usitatissimum L.)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on experiment of germination under different degrees stress of neutral salt,alkaline salt and complex neutral-alkaline salt for ten Linum usitatissimum genotypes including main cultivars of flax and linseed,germinating potentiality,germination percentage,germination index and vigor index were investigated. Comprehensive evaluation of Salinity-alkalinity tolerance was also analyzed by subordinate function value method. The result showed that: for all of ten genotypes,the germination reduced with the increase of ions concentration under the three groups of treatment. Low concentration treatment of neutral salt and alkaline salt have little effect on germination of all of ten genotypes,and have promoting effect for some genotypes. Complex neutral-alkaline salt has great effect on germination of all of ten genotypes and high concentration treatment of complex neutral-alkaline salt inhibited germination. Jinya 9 has highest tolerance to all of three groups of treatment among ten genotypes. Five linseed genotypes have higher tolerance than 5 flax genotypes in treatments of neutral salt and alkaline salt.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".