MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2370322659

Discussion on the Method of Rapid Geometric Correction for Remote Sensing Images——An Example of HJ-1 Satellite Remote Sensing Image Correction in Guangxi

2012· article· en· W2370322659 on OpenAlexaff
Jinli Wei

Bibliographic record

VenueGeomatics & Spatial Information Technology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
Canadian institutionsInnovation Initiatives Ontario North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer visionRemote sensingComputer scienceControl pointSatelliteArtificial intelligencePoint (geometry)Matching (statistics)Image (mathematics)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionSet (abstract data type)PreconditionGeographyMathematicsEngineeringGeometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the development of spatial technology,the application of remote sensing images is becoming more and more popular and the amount of acquired images is increasing as well.The geometry correction for these images is the precondition to make them better applied.The paper provides an approach to geometric correction by creating the control point set.This method is able to improve the efficiency of looking for the control point and the matching accuracy of images from the same area of different time,which thus improves the precision of edge joining.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.742

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeomatics & Spatial Information TechnologySame topicSatellite Image Processing and PhotogrammetryFrench-language works237,207