MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2370364608

Thoughts On Enhancing Technological Innovation In China

2001· article· en· W2370364608 on OpenAlexaff
Sheng Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Zhengzhou University · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Innovation and Industrial Efficiency
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompetition (biology)BusinessChinaIndustrial organizationGlobalizationTechnological changeProcess (computing)Economic globalizationEconomic systemInnovation managementMarket economyCommerceEconomicsMarketingPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the accelerating speed of the process of world economic globalization,competition in economic areas has been increasingly shown through the competition in technological innovation among the different enterprises.Hence,enhancing technological innovation in the shortest possible time is crucial to the survival of the enterprises and safety of national economy.In view of these,great efforts should be made in optimizing scientific and research resources,formulating policy and law,widening the path of collecting and circulating funds,expanding the technological resources and forming enterprises centered technological innovation,system.By doing these,enterprises in China can quickly extricate themselves from their management predicament,and occupy their market shares in the international competitive market.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Zhengzhou UniversitySame topicScientific Innovation and Industrial EfficiencyFrench-language works237,207