MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2370364608

Thoughts On Enhancing Technological Innovation In China

2001· article· en· W2370364608 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Zhengzhou University · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Innovation and Industrial Efficiency
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompetition (biology)BusinessChinaIndustrial organizationGlobalizationTechnological changeProcess (computing)Economic globalizationEconomic systemInnovation managementMarket economyCommerceEconomicsMarketingPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the accelerating speed of the process of world economic globalization,competition in economic areas has been increasingly shown through the competition in technological innovation among the different enterprises.Hence,enhancing technological innovation in the shortest possible time is crucial to the survival of the enterprises and safety of national economy.In view of these,great efforts should be made in optimizing scientific and research resources,formulating policy and law,widening the path of collecting and circulating funds,expanding the technological resources and forming enterprises centered technological innovation,system.By doing these,enterprises in China can quickly extricate themselves from their management predicament,and occupy their market shares in the international competitive market.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.676
Threshold uncertainty score0.563

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.008
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it