MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2370436788

Comparative Studies on Seed Imbibitional Characteristics and Seed Epidermal Microstructure of Culinary Rhubarb

2009· article· en· W2370436788 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yipeng Zhao, Lu Li, Cai Zu-guo

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Quality and Safety Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImbibitionGerminationMicrostructureBiologyCultivarHorticultureBotanyMaterials scienceComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seed imbibitional characteristics and germination and seed-skin microstructure were investigated using 3 varieties of culinary rhubarb.The results showed that imbibition of seed reached saturated within 12 h and water-taking amount of seed was 0.79-1.1 times of seed weight.It also indicated that seed could be well germinated on wet filter paper achieving a mean germination rate of 88.8%,but substantial differences of germination rate occurred between 3 cultivars,with Officinal being the highest(96.3%) and Guards man the lowest(80.1%).Microscopic observation demonstrated great differences in epidermal cell of seeds in terms of cell size,form and structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score0.258

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicFood Quality and Safety StudiesFrench-language works237,207