Reach on the developing direction of current agricultural information techonlogy in our country and its biue print design
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development of agricultural information technology has been unbalanced in different places of the world.Many developed countries such as America,Canada and Japan have recognized the importance of agricultural information technology applications.Our country is a large agricultural country,which is weak in agriculture.As the agricultrue production is still on the state of extensive cultivation and information technology application is nothing,the lag of agricultural information technology has resulted in the prices of agricultural production rising and our competing ability weak.All of this will impact on the agricultural developing in our country and our entering WTO.Aiming at the status and issue of the developing of apricultural information technology in our country and considering the feature of information technology development in the world,this paper discuss the possibility of developing and applying information technology to serve for agriculture modernization.How to use agicultural information technology in the knowledge economy.Age to minimize the difference between city and countryside,to raise the working productivity and eventually create an new era of China agriculture development.$$$$
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it