MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2370615690

Macro-economic outlook in 2010 in Heilongjiang province

2010· article· en· W2370615690 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiufang Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic Research Guide · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEvaluation Methods in Various Fields
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConsolidation (business)Economic recoveryEconomic slowdownEconomicsEconomic policyQuarter (Canadian coin)Fiscal policyInvestment (military)Consumption (sociology)International economicsEconomyMonetary economicsFinanceMacroeconomicsPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By the world financial crisis,starting from the second half of 2008 economic slowdown in Heilongjiang Province this year,a quarter of the bottom. The first three quarters of this year,at the national policy of expanding domestic demand stimulation,Heilongjiang Province,to stabilize the economy rebounded,but the economy still exist in the decline in exports,lower prices and other issues,the downside pressures still exist,the basis for sustained economic recovery has yet to be consolidation. Outlook 2010,the state will continue to implement the proactive fiscal policy and loose monetary policy appropriately,with the gradual release of policy effects,domestic demand stimulating effect on the economy will remain very strong,In addition,as the world economic recovery,Heilongjiang provincial foreign trade situation will gradually improve,in the investment,consumption,exports, This troika of working together,in Heilongjiang Province in 2010 the economy will enter a full recovery channel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score0.722

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconomic Research GuideSame topicEvaluation Methods in Various FieldsFrench-language works237,207