Effect of different surgical positions on the cerebral venous drainage: a pilot study using healthy volunteers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Excessive neck flexion and rotation in certain surgical positions may cause kinking of the internal jugular vein that obstructs cerebral venous blood flow and results in elevated intracranial pressure. The objective of this study was to measure internal jugular vein flow and identify potential impediments to venous flow in supine, prone, and park bench positions using non-anaesthetised volunteers. Twenty-seven volunteers were recruited. Venous flow rate was derived from ultrasound measurements of the vessel cross-sectional area and flow velocity. Change from supine to prone position produced a significant increase in both jugular vein cross-sectional areas without affecting venous flows. In the right park bench position, the right internal jugular vein cross-sectional area decreased from 1.2 to 0.9 cm(2) (p = 0.027) without substantive changes in mean venous flow rate (p = 0.91) when compared with supine. In summary, the internal jugular vein flow was not compromised by either prone or park bench positions in non-anaesthetised volunteers, and careful positioning may prevent kinking of the jugular vein. Further studies in anaesthetised and ventilated patients are needed to validate these results for clinical practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".