MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2370679915

The Government is Solely Answerable for the Assistance of the Childhood Education

2006· article· en· W2370679915 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fang Junjun

Bibliographic record

VenueEarly childhood education · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Systems and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Early childhood educationInvestment (military)Early childhoodProduct (mathematics)Childhood educationEconomic growthPolitical scienceEducation economicsEconomicsSociologyEducation policyPsychologyLawHigher educationPoliticsDevelopmental psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In our country, the government began to withdraw or reduce the investment to the early childhood education from the 80s of the last century. The qualified kindergartens were leased or sold out for reason that the childhood education is not obligated education and should be socialized. But does this mean that the local government should reduce the investment to the childhood education?The thesis analyzes the property of the childhood education from the economics, and it raises a viewpoint that the early childhood education, as a kind of would-be public product, only has to be applied and supported by both the government and the market, and this kind of method would be the most effective; therefore, the government is solely answerable for the assistance of the childhood education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarly childhood education→Same topicEducation Systems and Policy→French-language works237,207→