MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2370712215

Comparison and Analysis on Soil Nutrient Character with Different Grassland Utilization Pattern

2012· article· en· W2370712215 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiang Bao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Inner Mongolia Forestry Science and Technology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Agricultural Sciences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceGrazingAgronomyGrasslandOrganic matterNutrientQuarter (Canadian coin)NitrogenPasturePhosphorusSteppePotassiumGeographyBiologyEcologyChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Taking the typical steppe in the downstream region of Kelulun River as research object and the traditional nomadism as the control,the changing law of soil nutrient character with intensive grazing has been studied.The results show that in winter quarter and summer quarter,the soil organic mater,total nitrogen,total phosphorus and total potassium is nomadic arearotational grazing areaclipping pasture,and winter quarter is bigger than summer quarter.In winter quarter,there is obvious difference of soil organic matter,total nitrogen and total phosphorus among nomadic area,rotational grazing area and clipping area at 0~10 cm soil layer,the distribution of total potassium is different with other nutrient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Inner Mongolia Forestry Science and TechnologySame topicEnvironmental and Agricultural SciencesFrench-language works237,207