MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2370739996

The Introduction Trial and the Evaluation on Application of Sixteen Autumn Sowing Type Herbaceous Flowers from Canada

2009· article· en· W2370739996 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yanlong Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueXibei nongye xuebao · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicForest, Soil, and Plant Ecology in China
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHerbaceous plantOrnamental plantSowingLandscapingGerminationBiologyAgronomyAnnual plantGeographyHorticultureBotany
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Selecting the herbaceous flowers which could adapt to the natural and ecological condition in Shaanxi.The sixteen species of herbaceous flowers from Canada were observed by the planting trial for two years.The seed germination rate,plant survival rate,plant green period and blooming period were studied,and their ornamental values were evaluated by gray-correlation analysis.It was suggested that seven herbaceous flowers could be potential ornamental plant types in the Guanzhong Shaanxi,the rest of introduced varieties had some potential breeding value.It has enriched the ornamental plant species in the mid-shaanxi area landscaping.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score0.642

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueXibei nongye xuebaoSame topicForest, Soil, and Plant Ecology in ChinaFrench-language works237,207