Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les etudes sur Fran ois CHENG, ecrivain d’origine chinoise naturalise fran ais, ne se limitent jusqu’aujourd’hui qu’a une recherche par la perspective interculturelle, de sorte que celle-la ne se fait jamais d’un point de vue de la linguistique ou de la philosophie linguistique. Pourtant, le texte litteraire n’est non seulement l’ecriture de langue, mais aussi la realisation du mariage de la culture, du discours et de la vie d’ecrivain. Dans cet article, a la lumiere de la theorie du discours de pouvoir de Foucault ou de sa philosophie linguistique, on voudrait expliquer la relation entre la realisation de langage de F. CHENG et la fondation de son identite, en soulignant que la construction du pouvoir de discours est le moteur de reussite dans sa creation litteraire et que la doctrine antique chinoise constitue la raison essentielle pour fonder l’identite d’ecrivain d’origine chinoise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".