Bibliographic record
Abstract
In consideration of the complicated fading characteristics of high frequency( HF) channel and the difficulty of reappearing in simulation,a combined method of NS2( Network Simulation 2) and VOACAP( Voice of America Coverage Analysis Program) is proposed to simulate HF channel. Based on Walnut Street Model,the HF channel fading is divided into slow fading,mid-time scale fading and fast fading. In the fading model of HF propagation model,VOACAP is called in C++ to calculated slow fading on need, medium time scale fading is treated as log-normal distribution and fast fading is treated as Rayleigh distribution. The simulation results show that,this model can reveal the fading characteristics of HF channel, and the change of frequencies' fading with time of day is consistent with that of theory and experience. So this model may serve as the base of physical layer in HF network simulation. Meanwhile,the joint simulation method used in this paper avoids the complexity of calculation of channel fading before simulation,so it's more suitable for large scale HF network simulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".