The Related Factors Analysis of Elderly People with Mild Cognitive Impairment in Shanghai Community
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:To investigate the elderly people with mild cognitive impairment(MCI)characteristics and related factors in Shanghai community. Method:Used a case-control study method,selected 174 cases as MCI group,another 174 patients with normal cognitive function as normal control group from the 55 years of age or older with mild cognitive dysfunction in the city of Shanghai Pudong New Area,used MoCA on human cognitive function was assessed in the degree of education,personality tendency,behavioral factors,the dietary habits and other related factors analysis at the same time. Result:The analysis showed that overall cognitive function cognitive function was significant difference compared with different areas(P 0.05);in the multiple factors,compared with personality tendency,behavioral factors,dietary habits as well as the population level of education was significantly associated with MCI. Conclusion:The patients with mild cognitive impairment of memory,visual spatial ability,executive ability,language function, calculation and attention have different degrees of injury. Patients with introverted,yummy dinner and drinking are independent risk factors of MCI,while the use of people’s education level and regular exercise habits are protective factors of MCI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".