Applications of incinerators in well test of high sour gas wells at Puguang gas field
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Presently,the combustion cylinder is commonly used for well test at high sour gas wells. However,it often results in low combustion efficiency,incomplete H2S combustion,excessive SO2 emission and short gas well test time,so it's difficult to accurately evaluate gas production capacity. This paper hereby introduces the Q3000 incinerator which is designed and manufactured by a specialized corporation in Canada. The working principles,calculation methods of diffusion model and main technical indexes are introduced. The arranged nozzle design and logical control procedures can create a high velocity vortex and high combustion temperature ranging from 1090℃ to 1630℃,which can ensure complete combustion of high sour gas,adequate diffusion of sulfur dioxide. Six incinerators are connected in parallel so as to meet the demand of well test at high sour gas wells. The design capacity is 60×104m3/d. The accumulation hours of gas combustion in well test are 240 hours. The incinerators represent favorable combustion performances with long period,high efficiency and full load. The environmental monitoring results indicate that monitoring indicators can meet the requirement. System test in high sour gas wells is realized successfully,which provides scientific underpinnings for gas reservoir development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".