Study on Limiting Factors of Influencing Hybrid Rice Ear and High Yield Cultival Ways
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With II you No.7 as material to study the limiting factors of influencing hybrid rice earbearing and high yield cultival ways by hole application stage,hole application standard and triagle application N fertilizer.The results showed that the period before or behind seedlings number up to the most was the most sensitive period for influencing rice percentage of earbearing tiller.In all kinds of factors,light was the lead factor in this phase.The effect of increasing earbearing tiller percentage by adding nitrogen less than by improving light,increasing nitrogen could increase significantly percentage of earbearing tiller on condition that light condition of colony basal improved.Adopted triangle cultivation seedlings could improve colony basal light condition.In all,triangle cultivation seedlings and applying nitrogen at n-2 period was relatively good measures for rice production.Through these measures,seedlings became strong and number decreased significantly,percentage of earbearing tiller and number of grains per ear increased,led to increasing yield finally,but the extent of yield increasing correlated with soil fertility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".