Bibliographic record
Abstract
With from Han 6172 space radiation (Satellite'Shi-Jian No.8,2006) as material,and used it’s original parent as ck to study the head perplant of 6 dwarrf mutant lines.The result showed:(1)Plant height (PH)and HPP were two independent inherited traits and there was no relationship between two traits.Both could be improved simultaneously.(2)Mutation effect was two-way variance and it was ranged from -36.95% to 12.06% compared with ck.Variance analysis (VA) was all extrem significant.(3)It was recorded that ratio of positive variance line was only 16.67%,others were either equal or lower than ck accounted 33.33%,respectively.(4)16.67% stabled one was performed uniform in filed and confirmed by VA in SP3,the others remained segregating for this trait.(5)Based on the aim of HPP selection in SP breeding program much attention should be paid on its performance in field,methods of population harvesting and single plant harvesting could be adopted individually according to it’s phenotypic expression in SP3 generation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".