The Reconstruction of a Brave New World——A New Perspective of Text,Author and Reader
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the recent twenty years,the function of the author,the meaning of the text and the relationship of the author and his product with that of the reader are the major concerns of European and American writers both theoretically and in their writing process.Canadian author Carol Shields' Mary Swann is a typical work with such themes.The novel is mainly about how the four characters,from the camps of their own perspectives,with authority,interpret and reconstruct the history and the work of the dead woman poet in the novel.Shields attempts to reveal the relationship among the author,the text and the reader in the creation and interpretation process of a literary work in this novel.From Shields' perspective the author leaves the text after his intention is realized.The text thus acquires a relatively independent existence with the potentialities of contradicting and multiple interpretations.This situation creates the possibilities for the readers to reconstruct a new text with the previous one without the presence of the author.The process eventually leads to the reconstruction of a new world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it