MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2371565341

Soils Permeability on Different Position of Upland Measured by Guelph Method in Hilly Area of South China

2002· article· en· W2371565341 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dong Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Soil and Water Conservation · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Agricultural Sciences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoil waterHydraulic conductivitySoil sciencePermeability (electromagnetism)GeologyEnvironmental scienceRed soilSoil coverHydrology (agriculture)Geotechnical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soils permeability, derived from Quaternary red clay soil and red sandstone on three positions of upland are measured by Guelph method in hilly area of south China. The results show that values of saturated hydraulic conductivity of 0—5 cm top soils in down slope are always higher than that in up slope, no matter what kind of land use. It also increases with the increment of plant cover degree in grasses upland, and the relations of top soils permeability on the three positions of tilled upland can be arranged in value as follows: down slopeup slopemid slope.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score0.790

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Soil and Water ConservationSame topicEnvironmental and Agricultural SciencesFrench-language works237,207