MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2371753308

Changement of Peroxidase and Esterase Isozymes During Seed Dormancy-breaking Period of Acanthopanax senticosus Harms

2010· article· en· W2371753308 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhang Li-jun

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSeed Germination and Physiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsozymePoint of deliveryGerminationDormancyEsterasePeroxidaseStratification (seeds)GibberellinBiologyHorticultureBotanySeed dormancyEnzymeBiochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The seeds of Acanthopanax senticosus Harms were soaked in 100 mg/L gibberellin(GA) solution and then treated with fluctuating stratification.The seeds began to germinate after stratifying 16 weeks,germination percentage of the GA-treated seeds was significantly higher than the control.After 28 weeks,germination rate of the GA-treated seeds reached to 69.33%,in contrast,the control only 50%.During the experiment,polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis(PAGE) detected a band of peroxidase(POD) isozyme and a band of esterase(EST) isozyme at all stages,and GA could promote the two kinds of isozyme to express.Compared with the control,GA could make the new band of POD become stronger after stratificating 16 weeks and the new band of EST appeared first.The results showed that exogenous GA treatment enhanced the dormancy-breaking effect on stratification of Acanthopanax senticosus Harms seeds,and the effect of GA was related to the gene expression of POD and EST.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeed→Same topicSeed Germination and Physiology→French-language works237,207→