MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2372124227

THE CURRENT STATUS AND PROBLEMS IN THE STUDIES OF THE PHOSPHOROUS-RICH PERALUMINOUS MAGMATIC SYSTEM

2008· article· en· W2372124227 on OpenAlexaff
Rao Bing

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Mineralogica Sinica · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiquidusGeochemistrySolidusGeologyMagmaAlkali metalFractionationAlkali feldsparSolubilityPhosphorusFeldsparSilicicMineralogyChemistryBasaltVolcano
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Highly evolved phosphorous-rich peraluminous magmatic system shows distinctive geochemical behaviors.It was characterized as being high in P,and ASI,low in Ca,Mg and Fe,strong depletions in REE,Th and Y, and mineralizations of W,Sn,Nb and Ta.The alkali feldspar crystallized from the P-rich peraluminous magmatic system is often enriched in phosphorous.The abundance and distribution of phosphorus in alkali feldspar can reveal the evolution history of the magma.As P has strong affinity to Li,an assemblage of spodumene-amblygonite-montebrasite occurred in the last stage of magmatic evolution.Previous studies showed that phosphorus can depress the liquidus and solidus,decrease the viscosity and increase the solubility of water in haplogranite melts.However,there remain some issues in the P-rich magmatic system to be explored clearly in the future,such as the effects of phosphorus on liquid immiscibility,fractionation of REE and other incompatible elements,and mineralizations of the rare metals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.011
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Mineralogica SinicaSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207