MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2372316468 · doi:10.1109/jphot.2016.2566341

Adaptive Optimization of Quantized Perturbation Coefficients for Fiber Nonlinearity Compensation

2016· article· en· W2372316468 on OpenAlexaff
Mahdi Malekiha, David V. Plant

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE photonics journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerturbation (astronomy)Nonlinear systemComputational complexity theoryQuantization (signal processing)Computer scienceOpticsControl theory (sociology)PhysicsAlgorithmQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the perturbation-based nonlinearity compensation (PB-NLC) technique, quantization of perturbation coefficients is employed for reduction of computational and implementation complexity. In this paper, we propose and experimentally verify the adoption of a decision-directed least mean square algorithm for optimization and complexity reduction of PB-NLC equalizer. We show that for 32-GBaud dual polarization 16-QAM after 2560 km of single-mode fiber, the proposed scheme further reduces the computational term by 46%, compared with that of conventional PB-NLC with uniform quantization of perturbation coefficients for the same Q-factor improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.559
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE photonics journalSame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207