MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2372347460

A Study on Taxonomic Relation Extraction from Ontology Learning

2007· article· en· W2372347460 on OpenAlexaff
Wen Dun-wei

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Technology and Development · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Computational Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOntology learningComputer scienceOntologyRelation (database)Taxonomy (biology)Process ontologyOntology-based data integrationOpen Biomedical OntologiesUpper ontologySuggested Upper Merged OntologyInformation retrievalOntology componentsDomain (mathematical analysis)Relationship extractionOntology alignmentArtificial intelligenceNatural language processingInformation extractionSemantic WebData miningEcologyMathematicsEpistemology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ontology learning aims at constructing ontology(semi)automatically by integrating a multitude of disciplines such as ontology engineering and machine learning.This can lighten the burden of the manual construction of ontology.This paper introduces a framework of extracting the taxonomic relation semi-automatically for ontology learning from text.The key technologies of ontology learning such as domain concepts extraction and taxonomic relation extraction are discussed.The taxonomic relation of the ontology is realized,but the non-taxonomy relation need to be researched.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.010
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.015
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer Technology and DevelopmentSame topicAdvanced Computational Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207