MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2372489250

The Role of Aboriginal Peoples in Canadian Environmental Policy since World War II

2011· article· en· W2372489250 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xianhua Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Inner Mongolia University · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsDissentEnvironmental policyResource (disambiguation)Political scienceWorld War IIPolitical economyPublic administrationDevelopment economicsGeographyEnvironmental planningSociologyLawEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been increasingly clear that aboriginal peoples are central to environmental policy and politics in Canada since World War II.They no longer are at the margins of environmental and resource policy communities in Canada.There are several factors to account for this change,including the emergence of a dissent-permitting society,international pressures,more effective aboriginal political organizations,legal and constitutional changes.Although the emerging role that aboriginal peoples and communities play in shaping environmental policy and resource management is far from monolithic,the federal and provincial governments can no longer ignore aboriginal interests.Environmental and resource policy may well prove to be an important arena in achieving and improving well-being of aboriginal peoples communities within Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0310.011
Scholarly communication0.0090.001
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Inner Mongolia UniversitySame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207