MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2372572824

The Winneshiek Lagerstatte, Iowa, USA and Its Depositional Environments

2009· article· en· W2372572824 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Huaibao Liu, Robert M. McKay, Brian J. Witzke, Derek E. G. Briggs

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLagerstätteSedimentary depositional environmentGeologyGeochemistryArchaeologyPaleontologyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fossil Lagersttten are deposits containing abundant and/or exceptionally preserved fossils,often including soft-bodied tissue.Of these,Konservat-Lagersttten are especially important because they provide not only a much more complete record of the diversity and paleoecology of ancient communities,but also more detailed information on the taxonomy and anatomy of the biota compared to the normal shelly fossil record.However,Konservat-Lagersttten are rare because they require exceptional physical and chemical depositional conditions.Environmental conditions during the Cambrian may have been more favorable for the preservation of soft-bodied organisms than later in the Paleozoic,and such Lagersttten provide evidence of biodiversity changes during the Cambrian explosion.Although the Ordovician Radiation or Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event(GOBE) has been well documented,this is based mainly on the shelly fossil record because soft-bodied organisms are poorly represented during the 45 million years of the Ordovician.Only three Lagersttten,Beecher's Trilobite Bed in upper New York State,the Soom Shale in South Africa,and the recently recognized biota in Manitoba,Canada,approach the extent of soft-tissue preservation in Cambrian deposits.All the three Lagersttten are of Late Ordovicianage. The Winneshiek fauna was discovered recently near Decorah,northeast Iowa,USA(Fig.1) .It is preserved in a new stratigraphic unit which consists of greenish-brown to dark-gray sandy laminated shale with abundant organic carbon and pyrite(Fig.2) .The new fauna contains both invertebrate and vertebrate fossils;current recovery includes eurypterids and other chelicerates,phyllocarid crustaceans,ostracods,linguloid brachiopods,mollusks,isolated conodont elements and bedding plane assemblages,skeletal elements of jawless fish,various indeterminate fossil forms,and bromalites and other trace fossils(Fig.3) .Most of these fossils are extraordinarily preserved,some with soft tissues or body impressions,establishing the status of this deposit as a Konservat-Lagersttte,the only significant example of Middle Ordovician(Whiterockian) age. The importance of studies of the Winneshiek Lagersttte is manifold.The fauna contains several very rare taxa in the Ordovician fossil record.Phyllocarids,for example,are an important but poorly known group of Paleozoic crustaceans,and the resolution of controversies surrounding their taxonomic position has been frustrated by the rarity of information on their morphology other than the carapace.The new examples preserving trunk and appendages from the Winneshiek Lagersttte(Plates ①,②) are valuable for testing hypotheses of phyllocarid relationships and their significance for crustacean evolution.Eurypterids are the most diverse order of chelicerates in the Paleozoic,and the earliest specimens described in the literature are from the Late Ordovician.The Winnishiek eurypterids(Plate③) are not only the oldest but they occur on Laurentia,which is thought to be where the clade originated.This study will provide important new data to test ideas about eurypterid taxonomy,evolution,and their phylogenetic relationships to Xiphosura and Scorpiones. Vertebrates from the Winneshiek Lagersttte include conodonts and jawless fish.Conodonts are abundant and extraordinary in the fauna.Although more material is necessary to confirm that conodont soft tissues are preserved,the occurrence of several types of bedding plane assemblage,including the first known natural apparatus of Coleodontid conodonts(Plate④) ,has improved our knowledge of their classification and affinity.Many complete elements,comprising both basal body and crown,will also provide important information on conodont phylogeny and evolution.The evolutionry history and paleoenvironmental context of Ordovician fish remain poorly known.Articulated jawless fish fossils(Plate⑤) from the Winneshiek fauna certainly will provide significant new information on primitive vertebrates.Some 3-dimensionally preserved vermiform fossils(Plate⑥) and indeterminate fossils with special structures(Plate⑦) are also common.Their nature and paleoecologic importance need to be determined. The Winneshiek fauna preserves a remarkable range of non-biomineralized tissues.These materials provide important information on paleoecology,depositional environments,taphonomy,and diagenesis.Most of the eurypterids from the fauna,for example,are preserved as black or brownish cuticle remnants(Plate③) .Preliminary analysis indicates they contain a fixed-carbon component as high as 81%.Cuticular preservation of arthropods this old is rare.Organic analyses of such cuticular materials will provide further information on organic diagenesis,thermal maturity,affinities and potentially on conditions of deposition.In addition,the conodont elements range in color from amber through pearl to white.Along with the color alteration,conodont elements were mineralogically altered:corresponding dissolution occurs(Plate⑧) ,and dense denticle becomes an aggregate of water soluble fibrous material(Plate⑨) .Because elements with different colors occur in the same fauna,they must represent the result of different diagenetic or biologic processes,and the conodont color alteration index(CAI) of thermal maturity is not directly applicable to the Winneshiek Lagersttte.Bromalitic materials(Plate⑩) and other trace fossils frequently occur in the Lagersttte. The Winneshiek Lagersttte provides remarkable information on the depositional environment.Fine-scale lamination,in part sandy,in conjunction with the limited geographic extent of the shale,suggests a marginal to nearshore marine setting,possibly with tidal influence.The preservation of abundant organic matter and pyrite indicates low-oxygen conditions with restricted bottom circulation.Many animal groups that typify Ordovician open-marine shelf faunas,such as corals,bryozoans,crinoids,cephalopods,trilobites,and graptolites,were not found in the Winneshiek fauna.The restricted biota suggests deposition in an area that was separated from the open sea,possibly in a nearshore/estuarine environment with slightly brackish-water within Laurentia(Fig.4) . Preliminary considerations suggest that the Winneshiek fauna may have lived and been preserved within a meteorite impact basin.Firstly,the origin of the Lagersttte-bearing shale and underlying conglomerate/breccia succession in the study area is equivocal.The conglomerate/breccia unit consists of angular,unsorted,and multi-sourced clasts(Fig.5) ,some of which show boudinage-like structures(Fig.6) .The sediments differ significantly from those expected in normal deposits,but are usually found in impact structures.Secondly,results from analysis of water wells indicate that this abnormal succession is limited to a small area(Fig.7) .More than 400 wells have been drilled in the study area,and 182 of them penetrated to a depth below the Lagersttte-bearing shale.However,the abnormal succession occurs only in 29 wells(red points in Fig.7) ,which are distributed in a circular area with a diameter of about 6 km.Field investigations and a review of available well data indicate that the contact of the circulararea with surrounding strata is abrupt.In addition,faulting of early Paleozoic bedrock has been reported in the subsurface of the same area,although its extent and mechanics have remained poorly understood.More importantly,microdeformation features have been recognized in quartz grains from the conglomerate/breccia unit(Fig.8) ;such features have been widely considered as unequivocal evidence of impact.Two contemporaneous impact structures in the central United States,the Rock Elm structure in Wisconsin and the Ames structure in Oklahoma,provide comparisons with the Iowa feature:a similar sedimentary succession of,in ascending order,breccia,black shale,and pure sandstone;similar conodont faunas from the shale units;and similar paleolatitude settings in tropical Laurentia during the Middle Ordovician(Fig.4) . The importance of the investigation of the depositional environment is not limited to explaining the local geological history,but will improve our understanding of the GOBE,which is documented primarily from the study of faunas that inhabited open-marine shallow-shelf environments.By contrast,the Winneshiek fauna lived in a nearshore to estuarine(likely brackish) environment where faunal diversity has not been well documented.The possible impact structure which hosts the Lagersttte may also provide a test of the hypothesized link between the GOBE and asteroid breakup during the Ordovician.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.238
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils→French-language works237,207→