MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2372618435

Research on Multi-objective Flexible Scheduling of Workshop Based on the Demand Priority

2009· article· en· W2372618435 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hongming Cai

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocomputer applications · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRate-monotonic schedulingJob shop schedulingFair-share schedulingDynamic priority schedulingFlow shop schedulingEarliest deadline first schedulingTwo-level schedulingLeast slack time schedulingScheduling (production processes)Round-robin schedulingDeadline-monotonic schedulingDistributed computingMathematical optimizationOperations researchScheduleOperating systemEngineeringMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to provide customer with product on schedule,producing scheduling of company need to be optimized.Real producing scheduling problem which has some features like multi-objective,flexible,is the extension of job-shop scheduling problem.Therefore an algorithm so called multi-objective flexible scheduling of workshop in lean manufacturing based on the priority needs is provided for flexible job-shop scheduling problem. The objective of scheduling is to minimize the cost of job advance or delay and the makespan.In the process of scheduling based on dispatching rules,job processing priority is dynamically adjusted according to requirement date,and most appropriate machine is selected for each operation.A heuristic algorithm based on dispatching rules was designed.Consequently,the algorithm can figure out preferable result.Comparing with other methods proposed by other authors,it shows this algorithm is effective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.496
Threshold uncertainty score0.400

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrocomputer applicationsSame topicScheduling and Optimization AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207