MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2372711045

Multi-planar Reformation of Medical Imaging Volume Data

2009· article· en· W2372711045 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJisuanji fangzhen · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSimulation and Modeling Applications
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlanarVolume (thermodynamics)Spline (mechanical)Computer scienceCurve fittingMedical imagingSample (material)AlgorithmComputer graphics (images)Artificial intelligenceEngineeringPhysicsMechanical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multi-planar reformation (MPR) of medical imaging volume data was realized in several different ways. Based on this, B-Spline was used to produce a curve with control points input by mouse in three views and the medical imaging volume data determined by the curve according to the sample step specified at will was shown. Medical imaging volume data curved planar reformation (CPR) of high-precision was realized avoiding errors brought by simulating curves using pieces of lines. A better method was chosen after some experiments. MPR modules based on common PC platform were realized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score0.275

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it