Density theorems for nonuniform sampling of bandlimited functions using derivatives or bunched measurements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We provide sufficient density condition for a set of nonuniform samples to give rise to a set of sampling for multivariate bandlimited functions when the measurements consist of pointwise evaluations of a function and its first $k$ derivatives. Along with explicit estimates of corresponding frame bounds, we derive the explicit density bound and show that, as $k$ increases, it grows linearly in $k+1$ with the constant of proportionality $1/\mathrm{e}$. Seeking larger gap conditions, we also prove a multivariate perturbation result for nonuniform samples that are sufficiently close to sets of sampling, e.g. to uniform samples taken at $k+1$ times the Nyquist rate. Additionally, in the univariate setting, we consider a related problem of so-called nonuniform bunched sampling, where in each sampling interval $s+1$ bunched measurements of a function are taken and the sampling intervals are permitted to be of different length. We derive an explicit density condition which grows linearly in $s+1$ for large $s$, with the constant of proportionality depending on the width of the bunches. The width of the bunches is allowed to be arbitrarily small, and moreover, for sufficiently narrow bunches and sufficiently large $s$, we obtain the same result as in the case of univariate sampling with $s$ derivatives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.040 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".