Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:To investigate the coronary collateral development in ischemic myocardium of miniature swine Methods:Miniature swine underwent thoracotomy and placement of an Ameroid constrictor on the left circumflex coronary artery(LCX) Myocardial perfusion and function were assessed by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging, stenotic degree of LCX and collateral circulation by coronary angiography 3 or 8 weeks after placement of Ameroid constrictors Myocardial infarction area and vascular density were examined by histology or immunohistochemistry after sacrifice Results:SPECT imaging 8 weeks after placement of Ameroid constrictors demonstrated no significant difference in myocardial ischemia area, rest ischemic severity, ejection fraction of left ventricle and regional wall motion compared with those 3 weeks after Coronary angiography demonstrated that the stenotic degrees of LCX were all greater than 95% and only part obtuse marginal coronary branch in 1 animal was reconstituted Just small area of necrosis was revealed in 3 animals Immunohistochemistry assay revealed no significant difference in vascular density between three week group, eight week group and normal one Conclusion:The coronary collateral development in ischemic myocardium of miniature swine is very limited
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".